Results from Year One of a Three-Year Study of MacKenzie Scott’s Giving
In late July 2020, MacKenzie Scott shocked the philanthropic and nonprofit worlds with the announcement that she had given $1.7 billion to 116 nonprofit organizations. The gifts came in the form of massive, unrestricted grants, with a significant proportion targeted to organizations focused on issues of equity, and were made with no restrictions – only an expectation of an annual three-page letter back to the donor for the three years following their receipt.
- MacKenzie Scott
How did these nonprofits allocate the grant? And why?
Have the nonprofits experienced unintended negative consequences of the gift? What have been the downsides of receiving this gift, if any?
Do nonprofits believe this gift has increased their impact? In what ways?
How did these nonprofits allocate the grant? And why?
Have the nonprofits experienced unintended negative consequences of the gift? What have been the downsides of receiving this gift, if any?
Do nonprofits believe this gift has increased their impact? In what ways?
How did these nonprofits allocate the grant? And why?
nonprofit organizations
leaders
representing a 36 percent response rate
Finding 1
Nonprofit leaders describe these large, unrestricted grants as transformational for their organizations and their leadership. They believe the funding is significantly strengthening their ability to achieve their organizations’ missions, which, for many, is connected to advancing equity.
– Nonprofit Leader
Impacts of the Grants on Strengthening Nonprofit Organizations
ABILITY TO ACHIEVE ITS MISSION
Most leaders report this grant will significantly strengthen their organization’s ability to achieve its mission.
LONG-TERM FINANCIAL STABILITY
Close to two-thirds of leaders believe this grant will significantly strengthen the long-term financial stability of their organization.
LONG-TERM ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY
About two-thirds of leaders believe this grant will significantly strengthen the long-term organizational capacity of their organization.
of respondents believe this grant will significantly strengthen their organization’s ability to achieve its mission.
The Extent to Which the Grant Allowed the Organization to More Effectively Contribute to Advancing Equity
Note: Percentages in this figure may not add to 100 due to rounding.
of respondents said that the grants they received from Scott allowed their organizations to significantly or moderately contribute to advancing racial equity.
– Nonprofit Leader
Finding 2
Nonprofits are using the grant money to help those they seek to serve by improving or expanding their existing work and engaging in new work, often bringing on new staff to take on that work. Most are also using the money to improve their organization’s financial stability and to fairly compensate and support staff.
Uses of the Grant: Programmatic Work
Programmatic uses for which organizations have used or will use some portion of the grant (Ns range from 194 to 241)
For example: purchasing supplies, providing financial support such as scholarships, or regranting.
Note: Measurement and Evaluation is abbreviated as M & E.
of respondents report allocating some portion of the grant to support new or existing programmatic work.
Uses of the Grant: Financial Stability
Financial uses for which organizations have used or will use some portion of the grant (Ns range from 187 to 230)
More than 90 percent are using the money to improve their organization’s financial stability.
Uses of the Grant: Staff and Operational Needs
Operational uses for which organizations have used or will use some portion of the grant (Ns range from 191 to 220)
Nearly 90 percent of organizations are using the grant money for staff and operational needs.
Finding 3
To date, few nonprofit leaders have encountered organizational challenges or faced disruptions such as declines in other funding as a result of these grants. Instead, leaders were able to address long-standing needs and reported increased confidence and credibility for their organizations. The main lesson they believe this experience holds for other funders is to have more trust in nonprofits.
– Nonprofit leader
Clear Uses for Grant Funds
– Nonprofit leader
– Nonprofit leader
Results from Year One of a Three-Year Study of MacKenzie Scott’s Giving
Scott’s approach has challenged norms that influence giving by individual donors and foundations alike. Understanding the particular ways in which recipients of her giving have experienced it, and how they are using the funding, offers insights that can inform other donors as they consider how to give effectively. Find more data and analysis from this study in the full report. We look forward to continuing to study the impact of Scott’s giving in years two and three of this research effort.
Webinar video
Recorded: Tuesday, November 15th, 2022
*CEP acknowledges that it has been a beneficiary of MacKenzie Scott’s giving, having received a grant in 2021. CEP has no expectation of receiving further funding from Scott. This project was not funded in any part by Scott’s grant.
Authors
Ellie Buteau, Phil Buchanan, Maria Lopez, Katarina Malmgren, and Christina Im
Copies of the survey instruments can be found here.
View more reports at cep.org