This Giving Season, improve your effectiveness as a donor with CEP’s resources for individual givers.

Contact Us

Search

Blog

New Analysis Shows Foundations’ Grantee Perception Report Results Improving

Date: May 18, 2011

Ellie Buteau, PhD

Director of Research Projects and Special Advisor on Research Methodology and Analysis, CEP

Never Miss A Post

Share this Post:

CEP is pleased to be releasing a new research report today.  The press release is below:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Cambridge, MA—The Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP) released a new report today demonstrating that foundations that use the organization’s Grantee Perception Report (GPR) more than once are making changes that are benefiting the organizations they fund.

CEP’s report, Can Feedback Fuel Change at Foundations?: An Analysis of the Grantee Perception Report (.pdf), reveals that foundations that use the GPR – which is based on a survey of a foundation’s grantees – a second time receive substantially improved results, on average. To reach its conclusions, CEP analyzed data from tens of thousands of nonprofit grantees surveyed since 2003 in conjunction with the GPR process.

“We created the GPR almost a decade ago on the theory that feedback from grantees that was comparative and confidential could help foundations to learn and improve,” said CEP President Phil Buchanan, who co-authored the report with CEP’s Ellie Buteau and Shahryar Minhas. “We now have enough data to be able to test, empirically, whether this is true, and it appears that it is.”

More sobering, however, is the fact that there is little change over the years in results of foundations coming to CEP for the first time.  This suggests that foundations in general haven’t improved their practices in the eyes of their grantees, even as those that repeatedly use the GPR have.

The report highlights in particular the efforts of two foundations that have substantially improved in the eyes of their grantees: Endowment for Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). “If our relationship with our grantees is wanting, then it’s going to impact negatively our ability to accomplish the kind of goals we want to accomplish,” said RWJF President Risa Lavizzo-Mourey.

In addition to describing the data analysis and profiling foundations that have made changes, the report identifies four keys to driving change as a result of the GPR, based on CEP’s experience delivering results to some 200 foundations.

Along with the report, CEP also released today more in-depth profiles of the changes made by Endowment for Health and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation as well as a profile of the use of the GPR at the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation.

Ellie Buteau is vice president-research at the Center for Effective Philanthropy.

Editor’s Note: CEP publishes a range of perspectives. The views expressed here are those of the authors, not necessarily those of CEP.

From the Blog

Love Your Nonprofit Leader as Yourself
Love Your Nonprofit Leader as Yourself

This year-end season, let’s pause and consider how we can put the “Philo” (love in Greek) at the center of our philanthropy. Instead of our usual approach to philanthropy as the love of humanity, the end beneficiaries of our grants, I encourage funders and others in...

read more
Why Program Officers Should Embrace the Boring
Why Program Officers Should Embrace the Boring

Program officers have a tremendous influence on their grantee’s happiness. CEP’s seminal report on the importance of relationships between program officers and grantees documents that program officers can be a more important determinant of a grantee's experience than...

read more